Statistical Decisions under Ambiguity
نویسنده
چکیده
Consider a decision maker who faces a number of possible models of the world. Every model generates objective probabilities, but no probabilities of models are given. This is the classic setting of statistical decision theory; recent and less standard applications include decision making with model uncertainty, e.g. due to concerns for misspecification, treatment choice with partial identification, and robust Bayesian analysis. I characterize a number of decision rules including Bayesianism, maximin utility, the Hurwicz criterion, and especially several variations of minimax regret. The main contributions are the unified axiomatization of these rules in a framework tailored to statistical decision making, an axiomatic system that relaxes transitivity as well as menu-independence of preferences, and the introduction of new, regret-based decision criteria. Interestingly, the axiom that picks regret-based rules over maximin utility is independence.
منابع مشابه
A Neural Signature Encoding Decisions under Perceptual Ambiguity
People often make perceptual decisions with ambiguous information, but it remains unclear whether the brain has a common neural substrate that encodes various forms of perceptual ambiguity. Here, we used three types of perceptually ambiguous stimuli as well as task instructions to examine the neural basis for both stimulus-driven and task-driven perceptual ambiguity. We identified a neural sign...
متن کاملIdenti"cation problems and decisions under ambiguity: Empirical analysis of treatment response and normative analysis of treatment choice
Identi"cation problems that arise in the empirical analysis of treatment response generate ambiguity about the identity of optimal treatment rules. This paper develops general themes about decisions under ambiguity, next specializes to problems of treatment choice under ambiguity, and then shows how identi"cation problems induce ambiguity in treatment choice. The main ideas are given speci"c fo...
متن کامل“Dice”-sion Making under Uncertainty: When Can a Random Decision Reduce Risk?
Stochastic programming and distributionally robust optimization seek deterministic decisions that optimize a risk measure, possibly in view of the most adverse distribution in an ambiguity set. We investigate under which circumstances such deterministic decisions are strictly outperformed by random decisions which depend on a randomization device producing uniformly distributed samples that are...
متن کاملEmotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.
Uncertainty, which is ubiquitous in decision-making, can be fractionated into known probabilities (risk) and unknown probabilities (ambiguity). Although research has illustrated that individuals more often avoid decisions associated with ambiguity compared to risk, it remains unclear why ambiguity is perceived as more aversive. Here we examine the role of arousal in shaping the representation o...
متن کاملImpaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence.
BACKGROUND Alcohol dependence is associated with poor decision-making under ambiguity, that is, when decisions are to be made in the absence of known probabilities of reward and loss. However, little is known regarding decisions made by individuals with alcohol dependence in the context of known probabilities (decision under risk). In this study, we investigated the relative contribution of the...
متن کاملApproximate Models and Robust Decisions: A Discussion∗
In their paper, Watson and Holmes (2015) follow the statistical decision approach pioneered by Wald (1950). Under Wald’s perspective, the aim of the analysis shifts from the discovery of a statistical “truth” (for instance, as revealed by the correct statistical model), to making decisions that are defensible according to posited objective functions that trade off alternative aims. We also draw...
متن کامل